Peer Review Process for Journal of Compacta Community Empowerment (JCCE):

1. Initial Review: Upon submission, all manuscripts undergo an initial review by the Editorial Board to assess their suitability for the journal. This review focuses on the relevance of the topic, adherence to journal guidelines, and overall quality of the manuscript.

2. Peer Review Assignment: Manuscripts that pass the initial review are assigned to qualified peer reviewers who have expertise in the relevant field. The reviewers are selected based on their knowledge and experience to provide an unbiased and thorough evaluation.

3. Double-Blind Peer Review: JCCE follows a double-blind peer review process, where the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential. This ensures that the evaluation is based solely on the merit and quality of the manuscript.

4. Review and Evaluation: Reviewers carefully examine the manuscript, assessing various aspects such as the research methodology, clarity of writing, originality, and contribution to the field. They provide constructive feedback and recommendations to improve the manuscript's quality.

5. Reviewer Recommendations: Based on their evaluation, reviewers make one of the following recommendations:

   a. Accept: The manuscript meets the journal's standards and can be accepted for publication without major revisions.

   b. Minor Revisions: The manuscript requires minor revisions that can be addressed adequately by the authors.

   c. Major Revisions: The manuscript has significant issues that need to be addressed through substantial revisions.

   d. Reject: The manuscript does not meet the journal's standards or is not suitable for publication.

6. Author Revision: If revisions are requested, the authors are given a specific timeframe to make the necessary changes and improvements based on the reviewers' feedback and recommendations.

7. Final Decision: After the authors submit their revised manuscript, the Editor-in-Chief or the Editorial Board re-evaluates the manuscript along with the reviewers' comments. A final decision is made regarding acceptance, rejection, or the need for further revisions.

8. Publication: Once a manuscript is accepted, it proceeds to the publication process, including formatting, proofreading, and inclusion in the relevant journal issue. The accepted articles are published online and made available to the readers and scholarly community.

The Peer Review Process in Journal of Compacta Community Empowerment (JCCE) aims to ensure the quality, integrity, and credibility of the published articles. It relies on the expertise and judgment of external reviewers to provide unbiased and valuable feedback that helps maintain the high standards of the journal.